RAJIV SHAKDHER, N.SATHISH KUMAR
Sundar V. Srinivasan – Appellant
Versus
T. Ramasatyanarayana – Respondent
N. SATHISH KUMAR, J.
1. Since the appeal in O.S.A. No. 346 of 2016 and W.P. No. 4058 of 2017 is filed by one and the same person and the issues involved in the Original Side Appeal as well as the Writ Petition are also same, we are inclined dispose of both the appeal and writ petition by this common judgment.
2. The appellant in O.S.A. No. 246 of 2016 is a third party to the suit, with the leave of this Court, he has filed this appeal, challenging the decree and judgment of a single Judge of this Court in C.S. No. 454 of 2016. The facts in brevity leading to file this appeal and writ petition are as follows:-
2. (a) The 2nd respondent in this appeal is the South Indian Film Chamber of Commerce, formed in the year 1939. The 2nd respondent, South Indian Film Chamber of Commerce was originally governed by the provisions of Societies Registration Act, 1860 (Central Act XXI of 1860), thereafter under the provisions of Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act 1975”).
2. (b) The main object of the Society is to encourage and develop the film industry in all its branches in the whole of South India consisting of Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Karn
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.