S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
D. M. Venkateswaralu – Appellant
Versus
Managing Director, Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation, Villupuram – Respondent
1. The charge memos issued to writ petitioner dated 22.09.2014 and 01.10.2014, by the second respondent is under challenge in these writ petitions. A further direction is sought for to direct the respondents to accept the application submitted for voluntary retirement on 02.09.2013 and consequently allow him to retire from service with all benefits.
2. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the writ petitioner made a submission that the writ petitioner has joined as a Junior Assistant on 13.03.1987 in the respondent Transport Corporation and subsequently promoted up to the post of Superintendent in the year 2013. The petitioner has served about 25 years in the respondent Transport Corporation with clean records of service. The writ petitioner was suffering from certain ailments and accordingly, he was unable to perform his duties. Thus, he made an application seeking voluntary retirement on 02.09.2013. However, after submitting the application alongwith medical records, the 2nd respondent issued a charge memo in proceedings dated 22.09.2014, stating that the writ petitioner remained unauthorized absence and not attended the duty. The writ petitioner further states that ev
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.