1. The above Crl.O.P. was disposed of on 06.11.2017. Today (21.11.2017), it is listed under the caption "for clarification" at the instance of the Madras Bar Association.

2. The Madras Bar Association represented on 20.11.2017 that paragraphs 22 and 23 of the said order dated 06.11.2017 may be recalled, or in the alternative, to make it as a suggestion for amendment of the Appellate Side Rules of this Court and there need not be any direction that the directions made in paragraphs 22 shall take effect from 02.01.2018. When the matter is taken up for hearing today, no one represented before this Court. However, on behalf of the Bar, Mr.B.Vijay, learned counsel, who was waiting for another case to be heard by this Court, stated that a Division Bench of this Court in Crl.A.No.198 of 2017, by judgment (unreported) dated 12.04.2017, has already in a different case, considered the Clauses (i), (ii) and (iii) of the said paragraph 22 of the said order dated 06.11.2017 and the Division Bench in the said case, observed that the bail and anticipatory bail petitions shall be in the form of a petition. The said learned counsel also drew the attention of this Court to paragraphs 20 to