M. VENUGOPAL, J.

1. The Appellants/Respondents have preferred the instant Intra-Court Writ Appeal before this Court, as aggrieved persons, as against the order, dated 02.02.2017 in W.P. (MD) No. 4276 of 2009, passed by the Learned Single Judge.

2. Earlier, this Court, while passing the impugned order in W.P. (MD) No. 4276 of 2009, on 02.02.2017 at paragraph Nos. 10 and 11, had observed the following:-

"10. It is the duty of the Respondents to substantiate the allegation by furnishing legally acceptable evidence. It cannot be stated in air that the compact disc was introduced due to vide spread complaints in respect of bogus rank number. Moreover, it is shocking to note that the panel for promotion for the year 2008 to the post of primary school Head Master was prepared based on the incorrect number given by the Petitioner herself and she was placed secondary position. This contention is unacceptable and the same would show that the Respondents are lethargic in preparing in the panel. It is for their duty to prepare the panel as per the seniority list maintained by them. All of a sudden they cannot do through the Petitioner from the 2nd place to 10th position. Further, the Re