SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 210

T.RAVINDRAN
Nachi – Appellant
Versus
Poongodi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : N. Manokaran

JUDGMENT :

1. Challenge in this second appeal is made to the judgment and decree dated 25.06.2003 passed in A.S.No.45 of 2001, on the file of the Sub Court Sankari, reversing the judgment and decree dated 14.06.2001 passed in O.S.No.108 of 1998, on the file of the District Munsif Court, Sankari.

2. Parties are referred to as per their rankings in the trial Court.

3. Suit for permanent injunction.

4. The case of the plaintiffs, in brief, is that the suit properties, village natham lands are in the possession and enjoyment of the plaintiffs for more than 30 years and considering their possession and enjoyment, the plaintiffs had been granted HSD patta nos.118 to 121/1403, dated 07.10.93, respectively, in respect of the plaint A to D schedule properties and accordingly, the plaintiffs are enjoying the suit properties by paying necessary kists to the Government and further, the plaintiffs are enjoying the suit properties by raising natural herbs, small trees etc., and other than the plaintiffs no one is entitled to be in the possession and enjoyment of the suit properties. While so, the defendants, who are strangers to the suit properties, having no right or title with reference to the sam













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top