M.V. Muralidaran, J.

These Civil Revision Petitions are filed as against the common order and therefore both the C.R.Ps are heard together and disposed.

2. The case of the petitioner in both the Civil Revision Petitions are that they filed a suit against one K.Babuji in O.S.No.6543 of 1986 and other suit in O.S.No.6542 of 1986 for recovery of money. Both the suits were decreed on 23.07.1987. For realization of decree amounts, the petitioner in both the Civil Revision Petition filed Execution Petitions against K.Babuji and in the said execution petitions order of attachment was made on 22.11.1988. Pending the Execution Petitions one Smt. Vijayalakshmi filed claim petition in E.A. No. 297 of 1991. The said Smt. Vijayalakshmi is none other than the wife of K.Babuji, the Judgment Debtor in the above execution petitions. The said claim petition was dismissed. Against which the said Vijayalakshmi filed appeal in A.S.No.215 of 1999 before the learned IV Additional Judge, City Civil Court at Chennai and the said appeal was remanded back for fresh disposal. Again after fresh enquiry the claim petition filed by Smt.Vijayalakshmi was dismissed.

3. When the facts are being so, the 1st resp