SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 297

S.BASKARAN
S. Punitha – Appellant
Versus
S. Periyathambi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants :M. Karthikeyan, Advocate.
For the Respondents:S. Manohar, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

1. Being not satisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal, dated 22.04.2009 made in MCOP.No.347 of 2007 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Subordinate Judge, Bhavani, the petitioners/claimants has come forward with this present appeal to enhanced the award amount.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties will be hereinafter referred to in this judgment as arrayed before the Tribunal.

3. The case of the petitioners is that on 02.12.2006, at about 11.00 hours, while the deceased was proceeding in his two wheeler bearing Registration No.TN-36-K-1234, along with his wife, in Edappady to Kannangkadu Road, near Vellarivelli Privu, the Lorry bearing Registration No.TN-33-Z-6773 belonging to the second respondent and insured with the third respondent, came in the opposite direction at high speed dashed against the two wheeler which the deceased was riding, resulting in grievous injuries to the deceased as well as his wife who is the first petitioner herein. Subsequently, the husband of the first petitioner died on 18.12.2006. The accide













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top