SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Mad) 3862

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. NAGAMUTHU, ANITA SUMANTH, JJ.
THE SECRETARY, K. 1161 KALINGARAYAN PALAYAM PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD. - Appellant
Vs.
CHINNUSAMY - Respondent
Civil Revision Petition No.2433 of 2013 and M.P. No. 1 of 2013
Decided On : 19-04-2017

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. V.S. Kesavan, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. N. Manokaran, Advocate.

Headnote:

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Order 34, Rule 11 - Tamil Nadu Co-Operative Societies Act - Tamil Nadu Cooperative Societies Act, 1983 - Section 87 - Important legal issue as to whether a Registrar acting while passing an award, could order for payment of interest from the date of institution of the surcharge proceedings at the rate of interest lesser than the rate of contractual interest, has arisen for consideration - Held, New provision gives certain amount of discretion to the court. As has been held by the Honble Supreme Court, the court has discretion to order payment of interest from the date of suit under Order 34, Rule 11 of CPC upto the date fixed for payment in the preliminary decree, the same rate agreed in the contract or if no rate is so fixed such rate on the principal amount found is concerned - Ordered accordingly

ORDER :

S. Nagamuthu, J.

An important legal issue as to whether a Registrar acting under Section 87 of The Tamil Nadu Cooperative Societies Act, 1983, while passing an award, could order for payment of interest from the date of institution of the surcharge proceedings at the rate of interest lesser than the rate of contractual interest, has arisen for consideration.

2. The petitioner, a Co-Operative Society, governed under the Tamil Nadu Co-Operative Societies Act [in short, "the Act"], initiated a proceeding under Section 87 of the Act before the Deputy Registrar/Chief Revenue Officer / Arbitrator, Erode, in A.R.C. No.6982/2003-2004, claiming a sum of Rs.74,19,020/- with interest at the rate of 17% p.a. and penal interest at the rate of 3% p.a. Admittedly, the respondent had secured loan from the petitioner by mortgaging his properties. In the said mortgage deed, he had agreed to pay interest at the rate of 17% and penal interest at the rate of 3% p.a. The arbitrator passed an award on 26.03.2011 directing the respondent to pay a sum of Rs.74,19,020/- with interest at the rate of 13.50% p.a. from 27.03.2011 which was the date of institution of the surcharge proceedings. As against the same, the respondent filed a statutory appeal under Section 152 of the Act before the Cooperative Tribunal cum Principal District Judge, Erode, in C.M.A.C.S. No.36 of 2011. The tribunal by order dated 22.11.2012 partly allowed the appeal thereby modifying the award of the arbitrator. The cooperative tribunal, while confirming the award relating to the principal amount as claimed by the petitioner, however, reduced the interest to 6% p.a. from the date of initiation of the surcharge proceedings before the arbitrator. The petitioner is aggrieved by the reduction of rate of interest. According to the petitioner, the respondent is liable to pay the contractual rate of interest and neither the arbitrator nor the tribunal has got power to reduce the rate of interest from the contractual rate of interest. As against the said order of the Tribunal, this revision has been filed.

3. When this revision petition came up before a learned single Judge of this Court [M. Duraiswamy, J.], the counsel for the revision petitioner contended that as per the judgements of this court in Attur Thuluva Velalar Sangam v. S. Duraisamy, 2014 (1) MWN (Civil) 286 and Madurai City Co-operative Housing Society Limited v. Special Tribunal for Co-operative Cases, Madurai and others, 1999 (II) CTC 407, the co-operative tribunal ought to have awarded interest at the contractual rate of interest (13.5% p.a.) till the date of decree and the co-operative tribunal was in error in restricting the rate of interest at 6% p.a. from the date of filing of the proceedings till the date of realization of the amount. To the contrary, it was contended by the learned counsel for the 1st respondent before the learned single Judge that as per the judgements of this court in The Nasiyanur Co-operative Housing Society Limited v. Mrs. V. Kolandayammal and others, 2010-1-L.W. 499 and Erode District Central Co-operative Bank Limited v. Velayuthasamy Rice Mill and others, (2007) 4 MLJ 927, the co-operative tribunal has jurisdiction to restrict the rate of interest to 6% p.a. from the date of proceedings or the date of award till the date of realisation of the amount.

4. Having noticed the conflicting views expressed by these two sets of judgements, the learned single Judge thought it fit to place the matter before the Hon'ble The Chief Justice for listing it before the Division Bench to answer the following question :-

"Whether the civil Court has jurisdiction to restrict the rate of interest to 6% p.a. From the date of the plain till the date of realization of the money as held in the judgments reported in 2010 (1) LW 499 (Nasiyanur Co-operative Housing Society Limited v. Mrs. V. Kolandayammal and others) and 2007 (4) MLJ 927 (Erode District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd v. Velayuthasamy Rice Mill by its Pro





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top