SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Mad) 4006

T.MATHIVANAN
Javarilal – Appellant
Versus
N. Parthasarathy – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:M/s. M.L. Ramesh, Advocate,

ORDER :

T. Mathivanan, J.

1. Invoking the provisions of Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners herein who are the defendants in the suit in O.S. No. 72 of 2011 have approached this Court with this revision to struck off the plaint in the above said suit from the file of the District Munsif, Tambaram. The respondents 1 to 3 herein are the plaintiffs.

2. Heard Mr. M.L. Ramesh, learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner. Despite service of notice on the respondents 1 to 3, they have not chosen to appear either in person or through their respective counsels.

3. On considering the submissions made by Mr. M.L. Ramesh and also on perusal of the grounds of revision along with the plaint in the suit in O.S.No.72 of 2011 which is sought to be struck off from the file of the learned District Munsif, Tambaram along with plaint in the suit in O.S.No.130 of 2008, the following order is being passed on merits in the absence of the respondents.

4. It is manifested from the records that the suit in O.S.No.72 of 2011 seems to have been filed by the respondent herein as against the revision petitioners seeking the relief of permanent injunction. Soon after the filing of the s


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top