G.CHOCKALINGAM
M. P. Subburaman – Appellant
Versus
S. Raja – Respondent
G. Chockalingam, J.
The Revisions are directed against the Order and Decreetal Order passed by the learned Rent Control Appellate Authority, Devakottai, in R.C.A, Nos. 17 & 18 of 1990 dated 27.11.1992 reversing the Order and Decretal Order of the learned Rent Controller, Devakottai in R.C.O.P Nos.32 & 33 of 1989 dated 27.11.1990.
2. Brief facts in the cases are as follows:
In C.R.P. No. 2020 of 1993, the Civil Revision Petitioner is the Landlord and the Respondent is the Tenant. In C.R.P. No. 2021 of 1993, the Civil Revision Petitioner is the Landlord and deceased Kanagasabapahy was the Tenant and the other Respondents are Legal Heirs of the deceased Tenant.
2(ii) The Suit Scheduled property was purchased from one Janakiammal and after purchase, Janakiammal has instructed the Tenants to pay the Rent to the Petitioner. But the Tenant has not chosen to pay the rent from April 1989 and they have committed wilful default to pay the rent.
2(iii) Further, it is pleaded that the present building was very old one. The Landlord was directed by the Municipality to demolish the old building and construct the new building and obtained License from the Competent Authority and he has acquir
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.