SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 348

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. MANIKUMAR, V. BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN, JJ.
Canara Bank, Rep. by its Authorised Officer, Chennai – Petitioner
Versus
The Presiding Officer, Debts Recovery Tribunal III, Chennai and Others – Respondents
C.R.P. (PD) No. 631 of 2018 & C.M.P. No. 3288 of 2018
Decided On : 19-02-2018

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: P. Raghunathan for M/s. T.S. Gopalan & Co.

When a challenge becomes infructuous, no interim order can be granted and continued.

Headnote:

SARFAESI Act - Loan Default - 13(4) - 20% Deposit - E-Auction - Interim Orders - Negotiated Settlement

Fact of the Case:

M/s. Esjaypee Impex Private Limited defaulted on a credit facility from Canara Bank, leading to possession notice under Section 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002. Various legal proceedings ensued, including challenges to possession notice and e-auction sale notice, negotiations for settlement, and interim orders for deposit and status quo.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the challenges to possession and e-auction notices became infructuous, and the tribunal's interim orders were restraining the bank from realizing the outstanding dues. The court emphasized that if a challenge becomes infructuous, no interim order can be granted and continued.

Issues: The issues revolved around the validity of possession and e-auction notices, the appropriateness of interim orders, and the parties' attempts at negotiated settlement.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that when a challenge becomes infructuous, no interim order can be granted and continued. It directed the tribunal to dispose of the case expeditiously, not later than a specified date.

Final Decision: The Civil Revision Petition was disposed of, and the connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition was closed. No costs were awarded.

ORDER :

S. MANIKUMAR, J.

1. As no adverse order is passed against the respondents, notice is waived.

2. M/s. Esjaypee Impex Private Limited, has taken credit facility to an aggregate limit of Rs. 39.50 Crores, from Canara Bank, Chennai. Mrs. Madhubala Parmar, wife of Mr. Mahendra Kumar Parmar, one of the Directors also stood as guarantor and offered a property viz. land and building bearing Old No. 23, New No. 2, Ormes Road, Rajarathinam Street, Kilpauk, Chennai-600 010, as security. There were three other Directors.

3. Borrowers/guarantors defaulted and after classifying the loan as non performing asset. As there was an outstanding amount of Rs. 36,87,68,598.16p, as against the sanctioned limit of Rs. 46 Crores, possession notice dated 19.04.2017 was issued under Section 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002. Said possession notice came to be challenged in S.A. No. 126 of 2017, on the file of Debts Recovery Tribunal-II, Chennai and vide order dated 20.07.2017, Debts Recovery Tribunal-II, Chennai, granted status quo on condition that the respondents 1 and 2 should pay 20% of the amount due on or before 21.08.2017. Debts Recovery Tribunal-II, Chennai directed S.A. No. 126 of 2017 be called on 22.08.2017, making it clear that extension of time for payment will not be granted.

4. Being aggrieved by the order directing payment, M/s. Esjaypee Impex Private Limited, rep. by its Director Mr. Mahendra Kumar Parmar and Mrs. Madhubala Parmar, respondents 2 and 3 herein filed AIR SA No. 498 of 2017 before the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Chennai. In I.A. No. 1354 of 2017, respondents and 3 herein, prayed for waiver of pre deposit. Vide order dated 18.12.2017, DRAT, Chennai in I.A. No. 1354 of 2017 in AIR No. 498 of 2017, directed the respondents 2 and 3 to make a pre deposit of Rs. 10 Crores in two instalments. DRAT, Chennai directed I.A. No. 1354 of 2017 to be listed on 16.01.2018 for confirmation. Respondents 2 and 3 failed to make the pre deposit as ordered.

5. In order to realise the outstanding amounts, bank issued the e-auction sale notice dated 20.11.2017 and notices have been served on the respondents 2 and 3 herein and other Directors. The total liability as on 31.10.2017 was Rs. 46,50,54,569/-. E-auction was fixed on 28.12.2017. Being aggrieved by the e-auction notice, respondents 2 and 3 herein, filed S.A. No. 328 of 2017, before the Debts Recovery Tribunal-III, Chennai. Memo Sr. No. 14030 has been filed stating that S.A. No. 126 of 2017, filed against possession notice under Section 13(4) has been withdrawn.

6. Bank has filed a counter affidavit in S.A. No. 328 of 2017. For the failure to make the pre deposit, vide order dated 16.01.2018, Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Chennai dismissed AIR SA No. 498 of 2017. On 10.01.2018, when S.A. No. 328 of 2017 was listed, bank counsel could not appear. On the said date, Debts Recovery Tribunal-III, directed the bank to maintain status quo and posted the matter to 15.02.2018.

7. Setting out the fact that there were no bidders in the auction sale, conducted on 28.12.2017 and thus, S.A. No. 328 of 2017 has become infructuous, bank has filed I.A. No. 38 of 2017, to advance the hearing of S.A. No. 328 of 2017 from 15.02.2018 to an earlier date. On 24.01.2018, in I.A. No. 38 of 2018 in SA No. 328 of 2017, Debts Recovery Tribunal-III, Chennai, has passed the following order.

“This case is taken up for hearing on a mentioning being made by the Ld. Counsel for the petitioner/respondent bank. IA No. 38/18 is filed by the respondent bank to advance the hearing from 15.02.2018 to an earlier date. Ld. counsel for the respondent bank submitted that counter and typed set of documents had already been filed before the Registry on 20.01.2018 after serving copies to the other side. Notice in IA served to the other side. Ld. counsel for the appellant is present who prays time for filing counter in IA. At request, call on 06.02.2018 for filing counter in IA by the appellant and for hearing the parties.”

8. Agai






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top