V.M.VELUMANI
S. Kanakaraj – Appellant
Versus
S. Ramalingam – Respondent
1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed to strike down the plaint in O.S.No.191 of 2014 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Udumalpet.
2. The petitioners are defendants, the respondent is plaintiff. The respondent who is the brother of first petitioner and brother-in-law of second petitioner filed suit in O.S.No.191 of 2014 for partition, separate possession and to declare the sale deed dated 14.11.2003 executed by second petitioner in favour of first petitioner as null and void.
3. The respondent in the suit has stated that he is the younger brother of first petitioner and both of them have purchased the suit property from their father Sakthivel by the deed of sale dated 29.06.1993. From that date onwards, they are in possession and enjoyment of the suit properties. After purchase, they demolished the old building and put up new construction and let out the same to various third parties for rent. The respondent is residing in a room in the second floor alongwith his family. He was collecting the rent from the tenants and sharing the same with the first petitioner. On 30.06.2013, the petitioners informed the respondent that they are the absolute owners of the suit proper
Andhra Pradesh State Financial Corporation Vs. M/s. GAR Re-Rolling Mills & Anr. AIR 1994 SC 2151;
State of Maharashtra & Ors. Vs. Prabhu (1994) 2 SCC 481.
S.P.Chengalvaraya Naidu (Dead) by LRs v. Jagannatha(Dead) by LRs. and others
Jacky v. Tiny Alias Antony and Ors.
Surjit Kaur Gill and anr. v. Adarsh Kaur Gill and anr.
Meghmala and Ors. v. G.Narasimha Reddy and Ors.
S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu (dead) by L.Rs. Vs. Jagannath (dead) by L.Rs. & Ors. AIR 1994 SC 853
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.