SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 504

T.RAVINDRAN
K. Selvamani – Appellant
Versus
Palani Ammal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants :C. Jagadish, Advocate.
For the Respondent:S. Sounthar, K. Kuppusamy, Advocates.

JUDGMENT :

1. Challenge in this second appeal is made to the Judgment and Decree dated 30.09.2002 passed in A.S.No.43 of 2002 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Judge cum Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Namakkal, reversing the Judgment and Decree dated 30.01.1996 passed in O.S.No.435 of 1993 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Namakkal.

2. Parties are referred to as per their rankings in the trial Court.

3. Suit for permanent injunction.

4. The case of the plaintiffs, in brief, is that the lands shown as P in the plaint plan belonged to the second plaintiff and the same had been taken on lease by the first plaintiff by way of a registered lease deed dated 18.09.1992 and the above said property and the other lands, situated on the eastern and southern side, originally belonged to one Karuppanna Pillai and the total extent measuring 6 acres and 85 cents and the lands originally called as Mookan Punja lands and accordingly, it is stated that the lands belonging to the second plaintiff, after passing several hands, had come to be purchased by the second plaintiff's father Vangili gounder on 27.04.1938 and accordingly, it is stated that pursuant to the fami



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top