Viji vs Secretary to Government Government of Tamil Nadu Home, Prohibition & Excise Department, Chennai

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2018 Supreme(Mad) 530

C.T.SELVAM, N.SATHISH KUMAR
Viji – Appellant
Versus
Secretary to Government Government of Tamil Nadu Home, Prohibition & Excise Department, Chennai – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:S. Sasikumar, Advocate.
For the Respondents: R. Prathap Kumar, APP.

JUDGMENT :

C.T. Selvam, J.

1. Petitioner, wife of detenu herein, has filed this Petition challenging the order of detention passed by the 2nd respondent in Memo No726/BCDFGISSSV/2017 dated 16.11.2017, branding her husband as a "Goonda” as contemplated u/s.2[f] of the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Cyber Law Offenders, Drug Offenders, Forest Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders, Sand Offenders, Sexual Offenders, Slum Grabbers and Video Pirates Act, 1982 [Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982].

2. As per the grounds of detention dated 16.11.2017, passed by the second respondent, the detenu came to adverse notice in the following cases:

Adverse Case:

Sl No.	Name of the Police station and Crime No.	Section of law
1	M-8 Sathangadu P.S. Cr.No.869/2017	8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(B) of NDPS Act

Ground Case:

Sl No.	Name of the Police station and Crime No.	Section of law
1	M8 Sathangadu PS Cr.No.1005/2017	Man Missing @ 364 A IPC

3. Even though the learned counsel for the petitioner raised many grounds in assail

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2018 Supreme(Mad) 530

C.T.SELVAM, N.SATHISH KUMARViji – AppellantVersusSecretary to Government Government of Tamil Nadu Home, Prohibition & Excise Department, Chennai – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

C.T.SELVAM, N.SATHISH KUMAR
Viji – Appellant
Versus
Secretary to Government Government of Tamil Nadu Home, Prohibition & Excise Department, Chennai – Respondent