S.MANIKUMAR, V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
K. Venkatesan – Appellant
Versus
Axis Bank Limited, Rep. by its Authorised Officer, K. Thiyagarajan, Chennai – Respondent
S. Manikumar, J.
1. Order made in Crl.M.P.No.4328 of 2017, dated 18/1/2018, on the file of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Allikulam, Chennai, directing appointment of an Advocate Commissioner, to take possession of the subject property, mortgaged with the Bank, with the assistance of the Station House Officer, R.5 Virugambakkam Police Station, Chennai and handover the same to M/s. Axis Bank Limited, Chennai, first respondent herein, is challenged by the petitioner.
2. According to him, he is a tenant of the third respondent. He has been paying monthly rent periodically. He is not aware of any loan transaction between the Bank and the borrower. On 21/2/2018, an Advocate Commissioner, came to the house, in which he is a lessee and served a copy of an order, made in Crl.M.P.No.4328 of 2017, dated 18/1/2018, passed by the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Chennai and only thereafter, he came to know about the banking transactions.
3. Inviting the attention of this Court to the possession notice, dated 2/8/2016, Mr. P.Ram Japa Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the said notice was challenged by the borrower, Mr. P.Sathya Soul Raj, Kanyakumari Distri
Precision Fastenings v. State Bank of Mysore
Baburam Prakash Chandra Maheshwari v. Antarim Zila Parishad AIR 1969 SC 556
Whirlpool Corporation v. Registrar of Trade Marks
Harbanslal Sahnia and another v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and others (2003) 2 SCC 107
Saraspathy Sundararaj v. Authorised Officer and Assistant General Manager, State Bank of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.