SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 608

M.S.RAMESH
R. Selvaraj – Appellant
Versus
G. Santharaj – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:K. Balakrishnan, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

1. This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to issue direction to the learned Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham to consider the petition to recall the non-bailable warrant issued against the petitioner on 23.04.2012 in C.M.P.No.4386/2008 in C.M.P.No.1196 of 2005.

2. This Court in an earlier occasion had elaborately dealt with the issue as to whether the High Court, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, is empowered to quash or recall a Non-bailable Warrant when an alternate remedy under Section 70 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure empowers cancellation of the warrant by the court that had issued the warrant.

3. I had the occasion to deal with a batch of cases pertaining to circumstances for issuance/recall of warrants. After analysing the principles laid down in the various decisions of the Honourable Supreme Court and our High Court in detail, I had, in my order dated 07.09.2017 in Crl.O.P.No.13276 of 2017 etc., batch, held as follows:

“14. Similarly, in the case of Inder Mohan Goswami v. State of Uttaranchal [(2007) 12 SCC 1], the Hon’ble Supreme Court, has cautioned against the alacrity with which trial courts have iss



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top