SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 1103

M.V.MURALIDARAN
S. Veerappan – Appellant
Versus
K. Sundar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: M.L. Ramesh
For the Respondent: A. Harivasagam

JUDGMENT :

1. The instant Criminal Revision Case is preferred as against the judgment passed in Criminal Appeal No. 9 of 2015 dated 03.06.2016 on the file of the learned I Additional District Judge, Thiruvallur in confirming the judgment of conviction passed in Summary Trail Case in STC. No. 128 of 2014 dated 29.01.2015 on the file of the learned Magistrate (Fast Track Court), Ambathur. Further, the Revision Petitioner is an accused in a case initiated by the Respondent under section 138 N.I. Act. As the revision petitioner herein pleaded not guilty during the trial, he was ordered to face the summary trial.

2. The case of complaint is that on 10.04.2010, the revision Petitioner borrowed a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- by executing an unregistered deed of mortgage. However, when the amount was asked to repay, the Revision Petitioner did not repay the amount, instead he entrusted a cheque bearing No. 294541 dated 15.05.2011 (ICICI Bank) for a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- in favour of the respondent/complainant. Thereafter at the time stipulated by the accused, the cheque was presented on 06.06.2011, but the same was returned as “Funds Insufficient” on 07.07.2011. Subsequently, when the complainant inf



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top