SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 1263

P.RAJAMANICKAM
S. Soundarapandian – Appellant
Versus
Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:K. Samidurai, Advocate
For the Respondents:Prabu Ramachandran, Government Advocate

JUDGMENT :

1. This petition has been filed to direct the second respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry from conducting prayer in his house situated in S.No.42/9 in Rajagopalaperi Village, Thenkasi Taluk, Tirunelveli District.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is the owner of the house situated in S.No.42/9 in Rajagopalaperi Village, Thenkasi Taluk and he used to have prayer in his house. But, the second respondent is preventing the petitioner from conducting prayers in his house. He has further submitted that this Court in W.P.(MD).No.10782 of 2006 dated 14.08.2012 has clearly held that there is no need to get prior permission from any authority for assembling and conducting prayers in a dwelling house. He further submitted that in Crl.O.P(MD).No.15462 of 2011, this Court has directed the police not to interfere with the civil rights of the petitioner and harass the petitioner.

3. The learned Government Advocate has submitted that based on the complaint given by one Paulraj, a case has been registered in Cr.No.36 of 2018 under Section 153A and 505(1)(c) IPC against one Sakthivel Murugan @ Samuvel Raj and two others.




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top