SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 1276

T.RAVINDRAN
Kathavarayan – Appellant
Versus
Ramu – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. M.S. Subramaniam
For the Respondents: Mr. K. Chandrasekaran

JUDGMENT :

This second appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 21.12.2000, passed in A.S.No.44/99, on the file of Subordinate court, Madurantakam, reversing the judgment and decree passed in O.S. No.201/96, dated 24.08.99, on the file of the District Munsif Court, Madurantakam.

2. Parties are referred to as per their rankings in the trial Court.

3. Suit for permanent injunction.

4. The case of the plaintiff, in brief, is that he is the absolute and exclusive owner of the plaint schedule properties and they are his own patta lands and the plaintiff has filed the original patta and chitta extract to show the ownership of the suit properties and there is no pathway in the plaint schedule properties and however, the defendants with their henchmen attempted to form a road in the plaint schedule properties from the 4th of March 1996 and the same had been resisted by the plaintiff, the defendants are attempting to form the pathway to the burial ground and the Government i.e., the panchayat had already formed a pucca road adjacent to the suit property and there is a thaar road going across the suit survey numbers, which is clearly sub divided and even in the village plan, no p































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top