T.RAVINDRAN
Kathavarayan – Appellant
Versus
Ramu – Respondent
This second appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 21.12.2000, passed in A.S.No.44/99, on the file of Subordinate court, Madurantakam, reversing the judgment and decree passed in O.S. No.201/96, dated 24.08.99, on the file of the District Munsif Court, Madurantakam.
2. Parties are referred to as per their rankings in the trial Court.
3. Suit for permanent injunction.
4. The case of the plaintiff, in brief, is that he is the absolute and exclusive owner of the plaint schedule properties and they are his own patta lands and the plaintiff has filed the original patta and chitta extract to show the ownership of the suit properties and there is no pathway in the plaint schedule properties and however, the defendants with their henchmen attempted to form a road in the plaint schedule properties from the 4th of March 1996 and the same had been resisted by the plaintiff, the defendants are attempting to form the pathway to the burial ground and the Government i.e., the panchayat had already formed a pucca road adjacent to the suit property and there is a thaar road going across the suit survey numbers, which is clearly sub divided and even in the village plan, no p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.