V.M.VELUMANI
Valli – Appellant
Versus
Kandasamy – Respondent
The Civil Revision Petition is filed against the fair and decretal order dated 03.12.2014 made in I.A.No.716 of 2014 in O.S.No.198 of 2005 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Sankari.
2. The petitioners are defendants 5 and 6 and respondent is plaintiff in O.S.No.198 of 2005 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Sankari. The respondent filed the said suit for injunction restraining the petitioners and other defendants from interfering with the respondent's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property, particularly not to obstruct the pathway, cart track and not to damage the Mettur Left bank channel by means of permanent injunction. The petitioners filed written statement on 01.11.2005 and are contesting the suit. The trial commenced and when the suit was posted for cross-examination of P.W.1, the petitioners filed I.A.No.716 of 2014 under Order VIII Rule 9 read with Section 151 C.P.C., for permission to receive additional written statement filed along with the application. Though the petitioners filed additional written statement along with counter claim, they have filed the application only for permission to file additional written statement.
3. According
A. Mohamed Sulaiman and another v. A. Ameena Beevi (deceased) and others
A. Nandagopala Krishnan vs. Antony
Baldev Singh and Others Vs. Manohar Singh and Another
Jai Jai Ram Manohar Lal vs. National Building and Material Supply
Mahendra Kumar and another v. State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Mahendra Kumar vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Nair Service, etc. vs. K.C. Alexander
N. Vijayalakshmi v. Janakiyammal and others
Ramesh Chand Ardawatiya Vs. Anil Panjwani
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.