M. VENUGOPAL, J.

The Appellant has preferred the present Writ Appeal as an Aggrieved Person, in respect of the order, dated 29.10.2014 in W.P.(MD) No.17330 of 2014 passed by the Learned Single Judge, in dismissing the Writ Petition.

2. Earlier, this Court, while passing the impugned order in W.P.(MD) No.17330 of 2014 on 29.10.2014, (filed by the Appellant as Petitioner) at paragraph No.4, had observed the following :-

"4. This Court is not impressed by the arguments advanced by the Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner. Admittedly, in the present case, the Petitioner has suffered an Award. As against the same, he filed C.M.S/CS.No.3 of 2010, on the file of the District Court, Ramanathapuram. In view of the pendency of the Appeal filed by the Petitioner, this Court is not able to find any justification or merits in the submissions made by the Learned counsel for the Petitioner. Moreover, when the Award passed against the Petitioner indicated that he is liable to pay a huge amount, this Court is unable to find any justification for releasing the gratuity amount, for the simple reason that if the amount, which has been withheld, as sought for by the Petitioner, is releas