SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Mad) 3939

G.JAYACHANDRAN
State of Tamil Nadu – Appellant
Versus
R. Murugesan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. P.Govindarajan, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. R.Rajaratinam, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

The State has preferred this appeal against the Order of acquittal passed by the learned Special Judge for Prevention of Corruption Act Cases, Chennai, in C.C.No.152 of 2011.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the Respondent/Accused R.Murugesan while working as Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch, Anti Land Grabbing Wing, at Egmore, Chennai, between February 2010 and November 2010, demanded Rs.2.00 lakhs bribe for not including one Mujibur Rahman in the case registered for land grabbing against one Rameshraj. The said case in Crime No.58 of 2009 had prima facie material through the statement of Rameshraj that from the crime proceeds of the land grabbing Rs.70 lakhs had been shared with Mujibur Rahman. So, based on the said statement, the respondent herein who was investigating the case, had called Mujibur Rahman over phone and asked him to meet at his office. Accordingly, on 11.11.2010 when Mujibur Rahman met the respondent herein it is alleged that he has demanded Rs.2.00 lakhs for excluding him in the case. When Mujibur Rahman has expressed his inability to mobilise such huge amount, the respondent/accused directed him to pay initially Rs.50,000/- on 12.11.2010



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top