SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Mad) 3962

T.RAVINDRAN
Thangammal – Appellant
Versus
Karuppa Pillai – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mrs. Mythili Suresh for M/s. Sarvabhauman Associates
For the Respondent: Mr. J. Anthony Jesus

JUDGMENT :

Challenge in this second appeal is made to the judgment and decree dated 26.7.2000, passed in A.S.No.101 of 1997, on the file of the Subordinate Court, Kallakurichi, reversing the judgment and decree dated 31.1.1997, passed in O.S.No.932 of 1990, on the file of the I Additional District Munsif Court, Kallakurichi,

2. Parties are referred to as per their rankings in the trial Court.

3. Suit for partition.

4. The case of the plaintiffs, in brief, is that the plaint schedule properties originally belonged to the joint family consisting of Narayanasami Maniam and his three sons namely, Govindasami, Samidurai and Selvaraj. Selvaraj is the first defendant, Govindasami died about 20 years ago, leaving behind his sons and wife, who are the defendants 2 to 4 and his mother, who is the first plaintiff, as his legal representatives and Samidurai died as a bachelor, leaving his mother, the first plaintiff as his legal representative and Narayanasami Maniam died about 15 years ago. The plaintiffs 2 and 3 are the daughters of Narayanasami Maniam and in the suit properties, Narayanasami Maniam and his three sons are each entitled to 1/4th share and as Govindasami died, his 1/4th share devo





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top