SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Mad) 3976

N.SESHASAYEE
B. Sornam – Appellant
Versus
P. R. Kadirvel – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. G.R. Swaminathan

JUDGMENT :

The fourth defendant is the appellant herein. The suit was laid for partition of plaintiff's, share in the suit property. The Trial Court dismissed the suit whereas the first appellate Court allowed the appeal and granted a preliminary decree of partition to the first respondent/plaintiff for 1/4th share of the suit property. Aggrieved by the decree of the first appellate court, the fourth defendant has come forward with this appeal. Narrative convenience seeks that parties be referred to by their rank before the trial Court.

2. Admitted facts are:

The suit property is stated to have an extent of 34.4 cents in T.Sy. No. A/20-25 situated within the limits of Devakottai Municipality. This property originally belonged to one Venkatachalam Chettiyar. On 10-07-1961, under Ex.A-1 Venkatachalam Chettiyar had sold his property to Subburayan Ambalam.

Subburayan Ambalam's son is Periyakaruppan Ambalam, the first defendant in the suit. The first defendant had married one Muthammal, through whom, he has a son Ragunathan. Thereafter, he took one Panchavarnam as his second wife, through whom, he has three sons, viz., the plaintiff and defendants 2 and 3. He also has daughters through his
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top