SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Mad) 3991

V.M.VELUMANI
Marayi Ammal – Appellant
Versus
Muthusamy – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr.P.Valliappan
For the Respondent: Mr.Adeesh Anto for Mr.K.Chandrasekaran

ORDER :

1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the fair and decretal order dated 24.01.2011 made in I.A.No.297 of 2010 in O.S.No.162 of 2008 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Tiruchengode.

2. The petitioners 1 to 7 are the defendants 3 to 9 and 8th petitioner is the legal heir of the deceased first petitioner, first respondent is the plaintiff and respondents 2 and 3 are the defendants 2 and 11 in O.S.No.162 of 2008 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Tiruchengode. The first respondent initially filed a suit, O.S.No.938 of 2003 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Namakkal, which was subsequently transferred to the Subordinate Court, Thiruchengode and renumbered as O.S.No.168 of 2008. The said suit was filed for return of advance amounts against the petitioners 1 to 7 and three others. The second respondent and 6th petitioner filed written statement on 15.09.2004 and 24.08.2009 respectively and are contesting the suit. The first respondent filed I.A.No.297 of 2010 under Order 6 Rule 17 and Section 151 C.P.C for amendment to include the relief of specific performance and to rectify the defects in the description of the property mentioned in the sale agreement dated 04



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top