S.MANIKUMAR, V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
Central Bank of India – Appellant
Versus
South Indian Bank Ltd. – Respondent
S. MANIKUMAR, J.
Civil Revision Petitions are filed against the order dated 09.04.2007 made in I.N.No.2 of 2007 and M.A.No.11 of 2007, on the file of the learned Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, confirming the order dated 15.11.2006 in I.A.No.510 of 2004 in O.A.No.98 of 2003, on the file of Debts Recovery Tribunal-II, Chennai.
2. Shorts facts leading to the revision are that I.A.Nos.509 and 510 of 2004, have been filed, by the 1st defendant, in O.A.Nos.97 and 98 of 2003, seeking permission to lead oral evidence, to substantiate the defence, in the aforesaid O.As. Submissions made before the Debts Recovery Tribunal are as follows:
"(a) The O.A.Nos.97 of 2003 and 98 of 2003 are connected matters and the facts and principal questions involved in the OAs are same and similar. V.M.S. Jafarulla, the proprietor of 3rd defendant (D3) in O.A.No.97 of 2003, and his brothers V.M.S. Mohammed Sherfudeen and V.M.S. Haji Mohamed, the proprietor of D3 in O.A.No.98 of 2003 and one Asia Banu wife of the said V.M.S. Haji Mohamed, along with a person introduced by them as N.M. Sha
Ansal Properties & Industries Ltd. v. State of Haryana
D.R. Venkatachalam v. Dy. Transport Commr.
Dadi Jagannadham v. Jammulu Ramulu reported in (2001) 7 SCC 71
Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. v. Essar Power Ltd.
Mohd. Shahabuddin v. State of Bihar
Nasiruddin v. Sita Ram Agarwal reported in (2003) 2 SCC 577
Phool Patti v. Ram Singh reported in (2009) 13 SCC 22
State of Jharkhand v. Govind Singh reported in (2005) 10 SCC 437
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.