SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 1402

R.SUBBIAH, A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
S. Mareeshwaran – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : S. Malaikani, Mr. N. Anantha Padmanaban
For the Respondents: C. Ramesh, Thiruvadi Kumar

JUDGMENT :

R. Subbiah, J.

1. The appellant in Criminal Appeal (MD) No. 239 of 2017 is the first accused in S.C. No. 60 of 2015 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Virudhunagar at Srivilliputhur. The appellant in Criminal Appeal (MD) No. 498 of 2017 is the second accused in the very same Sessions Case. The first accused stood charged for the offences punishable under Section 377, 450, 302 of IPC and Sections 5 (1) read with Section 6 of The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (in short 'POSCO'). The second accused stood charged for the offences punishable under Section 212 and 302 read with Section 109 of IPC. After conclusion of trial, both the accused were convicted and sentenced to various terms of imprisonment as tabulated hereunder:-

  

Provision of law

Period of sentence

Fine

First Accused

 

Section 377 of IPC

 

 

 

Section 450 of IPC

 

 

 

 

Section 302 of IPC

 

 

 

Section 5 (1) read with Section 6 of POSCO Ac








































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top