SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 1447

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G. JAYACHANDRAN, J.
Selvaraj - Appellant
Vs.
State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption, Special Cell-Salem, Cuddalore Police Station - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No.460 of 2012
Decided On : 26-06-2018

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Duraisami, Sr. C. for Mr. Kandhan Duraisamy.
For the Respondent: Mr. K. Prabakar, A.P.P.

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 120(b), 167, 477A, 420, 409 - Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Section 5(2) r/w 5(1)(c) and 5(1)(d) - Offences of cheating - Criminal conspiracy - Criminal breach of trust - Falsification of account - Block Development Officer-cum-Panchayat Union Commissioner, along with the others entered into a criminal conspiracy to commit and abet each other in the commission of offences of cheating, criminal breach of trust, falsification of account in respect of purchase of electrical items for Thiruvannainallur Panchayat Union - Pursuant to the said criminal conspiracy, street light accessories for Thiruvannainallur Panchayat Union were purchased at a inflated rate for from Nalli Enterprises represented - Records were fabricated to appear as if the transactions were genuine - Day book and Registers were manipulated - False entries were made in the records maintained by Thiruvannainallur Panchayat Union as well as the Kandamangalam Agro Engineering and Service Co-operative Centre Limited - Prosecution on registering First Information Report (Ex.P23) had completed the investigation and filed final report against – Held, bill for contingent charge has been signed by the Commissioner (A1). By mere preparation of this bill, criminal intention could not be presumed against appellant herein - It is signatory of bill, who had applied his mind and allowed payment by affixing the seal and signature - Even otherwise unless and until there is material evidence to show that this appellant was part of decision making to procure materials for higher price and to share difference, he cannot be held guilty merely based on the sole evidence of the approver - Apart from these two incriminating materials discussed above this Court finds no other evidence, which could strongly substantiate case of prosecution that appellant herein as a Clerk in Panchayat Union office joined hand with higher officials and participated in conspiracy as alleged - Though conspiracy mostly hatched in secrecy, outcome of the crime done pursuant to conspiracy may lead to infer conspiracy - In this case, alleged crime of inflated price for procuring materials itself has not been satisfactorily proved in manner known - Court finds that contention of learned Senior counsel appearing for the appellant is sustainable and the order of trial Court needs interference - Criminal Appeal is allowed

JUDGMENT :

This appeal is directed against the judgment passed in Spl.C.C.No.4 of 1998 on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate/Special Judge Court, Villupuram, Villupuram District dated 26.07.2012 convicting the appellant for the offences under Sections 120(b), 167, 477A, 420, 409 of Indian Penal Code and Section 5(2) r/w 5(1)(c) and 5(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947. The trial Court had imposed sentence between 1 year and 7 years for the offences proved and ordered the period of sentence to run concurrently.

2. Brief facts of the case is that during 1986 at Tiruvennainallur, Villupuram, Cuddalore and other places of South Arcot District Thiru.S.Muniappan (deceased), Block Development Officer-cum-Panchayat Union Commissioner, Thiru.Kothandapani (deceased), Manager, Thiru.N.Ramalingam, Accountant, Thiru.M.S.Palaniappan, Junior Assistant and Thiru.Thiyagarajan, Junior Assistant of Thiruvannainallur Panchayat Union along with the others entered into a criminal conspiracy to commit and abet each other in the commission of offences of cheating, criminal breach of trust, falsification of account in respect of purchase of electrical items for Thiruvannainallur Panchayat Union. Pursuant to the said criminal conspiracy, street light accessories for the Thiruvannainallur Panchayat Union were purchased at a inflated rate for Rs.17,240.50 from Nalli Enterprises represented by Thiru.Ponnuvel Gounder. Though Nalli Enterprises directly supplied the goods, records were created as if the materials were supplied by the Kandamangalam Agro Engineering and Service Co-operative Centre Limited so as to avoid open tender procedure. The difference in cost was shared between the approver R. Radhakrishnan [P.W.2], Regional Manager and the staff of Thiruvannainallur Panchayat Union. Records were fabricated to appear as if the transactions were genuine. The day book and Registers were manipulated. False entries were made in the records maintained by Thiruvannainallur Panchayat Union as well as the Kandamangalam Agro Engineering and Service Co-operative Centre Limited. The prosecution on registering the First Information Report (Ex.P23) on 28.03.1990 had completed the investigation and filed final report against Thiru.S.Muniappan, Thiru.D.Kothandapani (deceased); Thiru.N.Ramalingam; Thiru.S.Selvaraj and Thiru.L.P.Ponnuvel (deceased). The trial Court, considering the materials placed by the prosecution and taking note of the fact that Thiru.D.Kothandapani and Thiru.L.P.Ponnuvel by the time died, tried the remaining accused for the offence under Sections 120(b), 167, 477A, 420, 406 IPC and Section 5(2) r/w 5(1)(c) and 5(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 and Section 109 of Indian Penal Code besides specific offences mentioned in the conspiracy charge.

3. To prove the case, the prosecution has examined 15 witnesses. 45 Exhibits were marked in support of the prosecution. A1 [Thiru.S.Muniappan], A2 [Thiru.D.Kothandapani] and A5 [Thiru.L.P.Ponnuvel] died pending trial and therefore, the case against them was recorded as abated.

4. As far as, A3 [Thiru.N.Ramalingam] is concerned, the trial Court has held him not guilty. A4 [Thiru.Selvaraj] Clerk of Thiruvannainallur Panchayat Union office was found guilty and sentenced to undergo (i) one year Rigorous Imprisonment for the offence under Sections 120(b); (ii) one year Rigorous Imprisonment for the offence under Section 167 and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- in default, to undergo 2 months Simple Imprisonment (iii) for the offence under Section 4477A to undergo 7 years Rigorous Imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- in default to undergo one year Rigorous Imprisonment; (iv) for the offence under Section 420 IPC to undergo 7 years Rigorous Imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/-; (v) for the offence under Section 409 IPC to undergo 7 years Rigorous Imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- in default to undergo one year Rigorous Imprisonment and (vi) to undergo 7 years Rigorou













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top