1. The instant appeal has been preferred by the sole appellant as against the judgment of conviction passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Chennai in S.C.No.280 of 2012 dated 16.04.2015.

2. The case of the prosecution according to the complaint dated 21.10.2010 is that on 14.06.2010 at about 11.00 a.m., when the Defacto-Complainant/PW1 was in her office, she was subjected under sexual intercourse by the appellant after administered her some sedative pills by mixing it in tea. Soon after the consumption of the tea given by the appellant, PW1 was got fainted and thereby the offence was committed by the appellant. Since PW1 was not in complete conscious, she was unable to resist but objected the same. However, according to the complaint PW1 stated that after getting full conscious, she got angry and assaulted the appellant, but the appellant was lamented and requested PW1 that he would marry her and he would not allow Pw-1 to marry anyone else. Further he also informed PW1 that he committed the offence only with an intention to get marry the PW1. However, though PW1 tried to commit suicide as her modesty was outraged, the same was prevented by the app