T.KRISHNAVALLI
Gopi @ Gopikrishnan – Appellant
Versus
State rep. by the Inspector of Police, Dindigul – Respondent
1. This Criminal Revision is directed against the judgment passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Dindigul, dated 28.08.2008 made in C.A.No.46 of 2007.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the marriage between the first accused and PW1 took place on 02.11.1999 and at the time of marriage, the parents of PW1 given 15 sovereigns of jewels, Rs.25,000/- and household articles worth about Rs.5,000/- and due to the wedlock, she begotten a female child and thereafter, A1 along with the other accused demanded dowry. It is the further case of the prosecution that on 05.09.2003, A1 got married A7.
3. In the trial court, 10 witnesses were examined and 11 Exhibits were marked. When the accused were questioned about the incriminating circumstances, they denied the same. The trial court convicted the revision petitioners/A1 and A7 for the offence under Section 494 IPC and sentenced them to undergo two years year Rigorous Imprisonment each and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- each, in default to undergo 3 months RI. Aggrieved by the judgment passed by the trial court, the revision petitioners/A1 and A7 filed an appeal in C.A.No.46 of 2007, which was heard by t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.