SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 1579

T.KRISHNAVALLI
P. Saraswathi – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr.P.Mahendran
For the Respondent:Mr. K.Suyambulinga Barathi, Government Advocate

ORDER :

The Revision Petitioner/Petitioner (Vehicle Owner)/third party has preferred the instant Criminal Revision Petition as against the order, dated 30.01.2018 in Crl.M.P.No.211 of 2018 passed by the Learned Judicial Magistrate, Uthamapalayam.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is the owner of the vehicle bearing No.TN-60-E-4251 (Mahindra Pick Up Van) and she derived income through hiring of the above vehicle for transportation purposes of various agricultural items in and around Uthamapalayam to other distinctions and while so, on 10.01.2018, the respondent police have registered a case in Crime No.9 of 2018 for the alleged offence under Section 379 IPC against four accused persons, on the basis of the complaint given by one Thanickachalam, who is a resident of the Gudalur Town stating that the accused were illegally loading banana Vaalai tharu belonging to the de-facto complainant on the vehicle of the petitioner and when he chased them, they ran away and based on the confessional statement given by the accused, it was revealed that one of the accused took the said vehicle from the petitioner stating he wanted the same for his personal and





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top