SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 1665

T.RAVINDRAN
Kuppan – Appellant
Versus
Rajendran – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.S.Kamadevan
For the Respondent: Mr.S.Kaithamalai kumaran

JUDGMENT :

1. In this second appeal challenge is made to the judgment and decree dated 28.08.2003, passed in A.S.No.10/97, on the file of the Subordinate Court, Attur, confirming the judgment and decree dated 28.04.1995, passed in O.S.No.131/90, on the file of the District Munsif Court, Attur.

2. Parties are referred to as per their rankings in the trial Court.

3. Suit for permanent injunction.

4. The case of the plaintiff, in brief, is that the suit property belongs to the plaintiff and the same had been assigned in favour of the plaintiff vide D card No.87/AM/1399, dated 05.10.89 and since then, it is only the plaintiff, who has been in possession and enjoyment of the suit property by paying kist and other taxes to the Government and the defendants are strangers to the suit property and are conspiring together to grab the suit property from the plaintiff illegally and in fact, the defendants approached the plaintiff to sell the suit property in their favour, to which course, the plaintiff had declined and aggrieved over the same, the defendants attempted to trespass into the suit property with the help of their men unlawfully and in this connection, the plaintiff has lodged a complai
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top