SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 1730

N.SATHISHKUMAR
T. V. Rangaraajan – Appellant
Versus
R. Veeraraghavan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:J.R.K. Bhavananthan, Advocate.
For the Respondents:S.R. Raghunathan, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

1. This application has been filed to revoke the order of probate dated 11.06.2011 granted in T.O.S.No.14 of 1998 in O.P.No.31 of 1995 on the file of this court.

2. The applicants, who are the grand children of one Tmt. Komalammal testatrix, filed the application to revoke the probate, only on the ground that the previous Will left by Tmt. Komalammal was suppressed and consent affidavit of the parties also created one. The Will did not contain specific recital regarding the earlier Will said to have been left by Tmt.Komalammal.

3. Denying the entire allegation, it is the contention of the respondent that the legal heirs of Tmt.Komalammal were added as respondents in O.P.No.31 of 1995 and notice was served on all of them. All the legal heirs who had caveatable interest had given their consent affidavits and the Will has been proved in the manner known to law. To prove the Will, the advocate who prepared the Will and the attesting witness were examined. The applicants in any event would not have any caveatable interest and it is not open for them to contend that too, sixteen years after the probate was granted, that the Will is not genuine and untrue. The application is barre















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top