SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Mad) 4104

P.DEVADASS
VTX Industries Limited – Appellant
Versus
Thiagarajar Mills Private Limited – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. B. Kumar, Senior Counsel for M/s. G. Anbu Saravanan
For the Respondent: Mr. M. Ajmalkhan, Senior Counsel

ORDER :

Some queer questions arises in these revisions.

2. These revisions arose out of grant of appeal bails by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai in Crl.M.P.Nos.433 to 441 of 2016 in C.A.Nos.30 to 38 of 2016.

3. Incidentally, there arises a clash between criminal law, company law and certain basic principles of general penal law of India.

4. As these petitions presents very same complex questions we have tagged them together and we shall dispose of them together.

5. The details of the revisions are as under:

Case No.

Conviction

Sentence

S.T.C.No.1774 of 2012

u/s 138 N.I. Act

1 years S.I. + Rs.60,00,000/- as compensation u/s 357(3) Cr.P.C.

S.T.C.No.1775 of 2012

-do-

-do-

S.T.C.Nos.1776 of 2012

-do-

-do-

S.T.C.Nos.1867 of 2012

-do-

1 years S.I. + Rs.50,00,000/- as compensation u/s 357(3) Cr.P.C.

S.T.C.Nos.1868 of 2012

-do-

-do-

S.T.C.Nos.1805 of 2012

-do-

1 years S.I. + Rs.1,29,00,000/- as compensation u/s 357(3) Cr.P.C.

S.T.C.Nos.1806 of 2012

-do-

1 years S.I. + Rs.58,00,


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top