SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Mad) 4125

N.AUTHINATHAN
S. Shanmugavel – Appellant
Versus
N. Indhulekha – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : M. Guruprasad
For the Respondents: I.C. Vasudevan

JUDGMENT :

N. Authinathan, J.

1. The complainant in S.T.C. No. 246 of 2012 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court No. 2, Erode, is the appellant. He filed the complaint for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act on the allegations that the respondent herein/accused had borrowed a sum of Rs. 2,00,000/- from him on 20.02.2012 that for the discharge of the said liability, the respondent had issued the cheque in question, that the cheque presented for collection was dishonoured, that the complainant had issued a notice calling upon the respondent to make payment and that the accused has failed to repay the amount. In support of the complaint, the complainant examined himself as P.W. 1 and marked Exs. P.1 to P.5. The accused pleaded not guilty. She did not adduce any evidence on her behalf.

2. The trial Court accepted the case of the complainant and convicted the accused of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced her to undergo simple imprisonment for one year and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/- and in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for one month. Aggrieved by the said order of conviction and sen














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top