SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Mad) 4169

G.JAYACHANDRAN
N. Natarajan – Appellant
Versus
State by Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, Dharmapuri – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr.A.K.Kumaraswamy, SC for Mr.S.Kaithamalaikumaran, Mr.A.Thiyagarajan.
For the Respondent: Mr.R.Ravichandran, GA.

JUDGMENT :

1. The appellants in Crl.A.No.956 of 2002 are arrayed as A5, A7 and A8; the appellant in Crl.A.No.984 of 2002 is arrayed as A2; the appellant in Crl.A.No.998 of 2002 is arrayed as A1; the appellant in Crl.A.No.991 of 2002 is arrayed as A3 and the appellant in Crl.A.No.1008 of 2002 is arrayed as A6 in C.C.No.1 of 1987 on the file of the First Additional Sessions Judge cum Chief Judicial Magistrate, Krishnagiri. Pending appeals, the 1st accused S.Murugan, 6th accused M.A.Yesudoss and the 3rd accused viz., A.N.Vedhachalam died.

2. The trial Court, under judgment, dated 14.06.2002, has convicted the appellants/accused and sentenced them as follows:

Rank of the accused

Conviction for the offence under section

Sentence imposed by the trial Court

A2

120(B) of IPC

 

167 of IPC

 

420 of IPC

 

5(1)(d) r/w 5(2) of PC Act

to undergo RI for 1 year

 

to undergo RI for 2 years

 

to undergo RI for 2 years and imposed a fine of Rs.1000/- i/d, to undergo 3 months imprison































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top