SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Mad) 4136

T.RAJA
Minor M. Balaji – Appellant
Versus
S. Venkatachalam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. N. Manokaran.
For the Respondents: Ms. C. Harini for Mr. N. Vijayaraghavan.

JUDGMENT :

T. Raja, J.

1. These three Appeals have been filed by the Appellants/Claimants, being the members of the same family, namely, husband, wife and minor son, challenging the common Award passed in M.C.O.P. Nos. 207, 209 & 206 of 2008 respectively dated 27.12.2010 by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Additional District Judge), Fast Track Court No. 1, Erode restricting the Compensation payable to them at 50% on the ground of Contributory Negligence.

2. Mr. N. Manokaran, learned counsel for the appellants, assailing the impugned common award, pointed out the following infirmities committed by the Tribunal:

(i) The fixing of contributory negligence on the part of the Appellants/Claimants at 50% merely on the ground that four persons, namely, husband, wife and two kids travelled in the motor-cycle, without there being any evidence to show that the driver of the motor-cycle had caused the accident, is not legally sustainable.

(ii) The non-production of the Driving Licence by PW-1 cannot be put against the claimants, when it was not even seriously disputed by the Respondent-Insurance Company. Moreover, the non-production of the driving licence of PW-1 was also not the subject matte














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top