SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Mad) 4145

S.VIMALA
M. Premkumar – Appellant
Versus
M. Palaniappan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Ma. P. Thangavel.
For the Respondent: Mr. R.T. Sundari.

JUDGMENT :

S. Vimala, J.

1. The care, compassion and concern for a living injured person, deprived of full pleasures of living, shattered of his dream of colourful living on account of the accident should be higher than in cases of death. The two main loss in personal injury cases are personal loss and pecuniary loss.

1.1. Alleging that the amount of compensation awarded is not in conformity with the compassion and humanity and accountability of the Tribunal to award just compensation, the victim has filed this appeal for enhancement of compensation.

2. In respect of amputation (of right leg) sustained, in a road accident that took place on 03.06.2008, by a Sportsman with the aim of becoming a Police Officer, M. Premkumar, aged 19 years, who had been studying 12th standard, the Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs. 3,48,947/- and the break up details are as under:-

Permanent Disability (Rs. 2,000/- x 80%) -

Rs. 1,60,000/-

Medical Expenses

Rs. 1,46,947/-

Pain and Suffering

Rs. 20,000/-

Extra nourishment

Rs. 20,000/-

Transport Expense

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top