1. The petitioner is the wife.

2. The respondent is the husband.

3. It is found that the respondent has laid HMOP.No.2475/2018 against the petitioner for seeking divorce and the same is pending on the file of the V Additional Family Court, Chennai.

4. Seeking transfer of the abovesaid proceeding from Chennai Court to Kallakurichi Court, the present transfer petition has come to be laid by the petitioner.

5. According to the petitioner, she is residing at Kallakuruchi, far away from Chennai and thereby experiencing difficulty and hardship in attending the proceeding at Chennai Court and accordingly sought for the transfer of the proceeding as prayed for. The respondent has contested the claim of the petitioner in transferring the proceeding to Kallakurichi Court and during the course of arguments, the respondent's counsel would also contend that the petitioner is employed at Chennai and also residing at Chennai. However, the said fact is stoutly resisted by the petitioner. Despite the same, no material, prima facie, has been projected by the respondent to evidence that the petitioner is employed at Chennai as well as residing at Chennai. On the other hand, according to the petiti