IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. Manikumar, Subramonium Prasad, JJ.
Thangaraj – Petitioner
Versus
The District Collector, Salem District and Ors. – Respondents
W.P.No.12711 of 2018 and W.M.P.No.14896 of 2018
Decided On : 11-09-2018
Patta - Land Dispute - Tamil Nadu Patta Pass-Book Act, 1983, Section 10
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought a Writ of Mandamus to direct the issuance of patta in the name of two temples on a vacant government land. The land was used for temple activities and festivals, but the Revenue Department proposed to form a playground on it.
Finding of the Court:
The court directed the Competent Authority to consider the petitioner's representation under Section 10 of the Tamil Nadu Patta Pass-Book Act, 1983, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the dispute.
Issues: Dispute over the usage of vacant government land for temple activities and festivals, and the proposed formation of a playground by the Revenue Department.
Ratio Decidendi: The Competent Authority under Section 10 of the Act is directed to consider the petitioner's representation and make a decision, without prejudice to the Revenue Department's authority to decide the land's usage.
Final Decision: The writ petition was disposed of without expressing any opinion on the merits, and no costs were awarded.
S. Manikumar, J.
Petitioner, Resident at Karungalpatti Village, Vazhapadi Taluk, Salem District, and claiming himself to a public interest litigant, has sought for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 4 to issue patta in the name of Sri Mariamman and Sri Selliyamman Temple, Karungalpatti Village, Vazhapadi Taluk, Salem District in respect of the property comprised in Survey No.55/1, Old Survey No.40, based on the representation of the petitioner and public, dated 19.04.2018, forthwith.
2. Supporting the prayer sought for, Mr. C. Prabakaran, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, in the above said Village, there are two temples namely "Sri Mariamman and Sri Selliyamman Temple" belonging to Vellalar Community. There are lands adjacent to the above said temples. When, people belonging to Vellalar Community, took steps to construct a temple in the vacant land, there was an objection by the other community people. Peace committee was conducted by the official respondents with the assistance of police, in the month of November 2017.
3. While matters stood thus, Revenue Department has proposed to form a playground in the said vacant land belonging to the Government.
4. Contending further that, the Villagers of Karungalpatti Village, Vazhapadi Taluk, Salem District, have right over the vacant land used for celebrations of festivals, such as car festival, cooking pongal, and other events, petitioner is stated to have sent a representation dated 19.04.2018, to the Revenue Divisional Officer, Salem District, with a copy marked to the District Collector and Tahsildar, Salem District, respectively.
5. Contending inter alia that the said representation has not been answered, instant writ petition has been filed. In the said representation, petitioner has sought for issuance of patta, in the name of above said temples.
6. On instructions from the Block Development Officer, Village Panchayat Union, Salem District, Mr. M. Elumalai, learned Government Advocate, appearing for the fourth respondent, submitted that he has been instructed to state as follows:-
xxx xxx xxx
7. Heard the learned counsel for the contesting parties and perused the materials available on record.
8. Averments made in the supporting affidavit, that temples namely "Sri Mariamman and Sri Selliyamman Temple", belong to Vellalar Community, Poojas and festivals, are performed in the vacant Government land, are question of facts. Even as per the version of the petitioner, has claimed to be a probona public interest litigant, when attempt to construct temple in the vacant Government land and renovation sought to be made, people belonging to other communities in the same village, seemed to have objected to the same and when it was about to create a law and order problem, peace committee meeting has been conducted by the official respondents with the help of police.
9. Petitioner has contended that both parities have been advised not to indulge any violation activities, till a final decision is taken by the authorities and according to the petitioner, when the disputes between two parties, were pending resolution, Revenue Department has decided to form a playground in the land belonging to the Government.
10. Fact that vacant land belongs to the Government, is not disputed, but according to the petitioner, the said place is being used during celebrations of festivals, such as car festival, cooking pongal, and other events. Petitioner, claiming himself to be a public interest litigant, has sent a representation for grant of patta, in the names of above said temples.
11. Admittedly, it is a Government land. Section 10 of the Tamil Nadu Patta Pass-Book Act, 1983, reads thus:-
10. Modification of entries in the patta pass-book-(1) Where any person claims that any modification is required in respect of any entry in the patta pass-book already issued under Section 3 either by reason of the death of any person or by reason of the transfer of interest in the land or by
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.