1. The lis on hand has arisen consequent to the order impugned dated 03.08.2015 issued by the third respondent, holding that with reference to the letters cited in the reference stipulated in the impugned order, it is stated that a final decision of the competent authority of the Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (hereinafter referred to as BSNL) was communicated to the writ petitioner in their office letter dated 24.08.2013 and the petitioner was advised to take suitable remedial action as deemed fit for recovery from the borrowers. It is once again stated that the loan applications were not authenticated / authorised by the Accounts Officer(Pay & Claims).

2. The letter referred dated 24.08.2013 states that already the writ petitioner was informed that the loan applications were not authenticated / authorised by the Accounts Officer(Pay & Claims), office of the GM Telecom, Tirupathi for recovery from the pay and allowances of the officials. Accordingly, the petitioner was advised to take suitable remedial action as deemed fit for recovery of the same from the borrowers.

3. On a perusal of the impugned orders, it is made clear that even before the year 2013, the respondents had inf