1. The facts presented by the learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the writ petitioner are that on 05.05.2009, the petitioner had sent a letter to the 1st respondent/State Government, seeking permission to utilize the Government Poramboke Lands on payment of prescribed fee as determined by the Government, for the Lands falling within the S.F. Nos mentioned in the Annexure 'B' to the letter dated 05.05.2009. The Survey Numbers also include the disputed the Government Poramboke Land[S.F.No.4/11] in the impugned order. It is contended that the letter dated 05.05.2009, addressed to the 1st respondent is still pending for consideration. During the pendency of the letter and when the same is under the consideration of the 1st respondent/State Government, the developments took place and the Sub-Collector now passed the impugned order dated 10.02.2015, directing the writ petitioner to vacate the portion of the Government Poramboke Land in their possession and enjoyment for few years. The writ petitioner sent a letter to the 3rd respondent/The District Collector on 06.06.2009, seeking permission to utilize the Government Poramboke Lands in terms of exchanging the patta lands