1. Petitioner is the wife. Respondent is the husband.

2. The petitioner is residing at Chennai and the respondent is residing at Mathuranthagam.

3. Inasmuch as the parties had not seen eye to eye in respect of their marital life, it is found that the respondent has preferred the petition for restitution of conjugal rights against the petitioner in H.M.O.P.No.45 of 2018 on the file of the Sub Court, Mathuranthagam. Seeking transfer of the above said proceeding to the file of the jurisdictional court at Chennai, the present transfer petition had come to be laid by the petitioner.

4. The reasons given by the petitioner for the transfer is that, since she is living at Chennai and afraid of going to Mathuranthagam during the hearing dates as the same would be threatening to her life and body at the hands of respondent, according to the petitioner, she has come forward with the transfer petition. However, the ground projected by the petitioner for transfer is unacceptable.

5. It has not been made out by the petitioner by placing acceptable materials that she had been at any point of time, subject to any harassment or ill-treatment at the hands of the respondent. If the same had been t