SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 2194

N.KIRUBAKARAN, S.BASKARAN
K. Bannarisamy – Appellant
Versus
Anbalagan S/o Vadivel – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. Ma. P. Thangavel.
For the Respondents: Mr. S. Manohar.

JUDGMENT :

N. KIRUBAKARAN, J.

1. The appeal has been preferred by the claimants aggrieved over the grant of Rs.25,000/- towards no fault liability by the Tribunal in the claim petition filed by them for the death of their son B. Vigneswaran, a 23 year old third year B.E., student studying at Vel's University, Chennai in the accident occurred on 8.6.2012.

2. Heard Mr. Ma. P. Thangavel, learned counsel for the appellants and Mr. S. Manohar, learned counsel for the third respondent Insurance Company.

3. The case of the appellants/claimants was that when the victim was riding the two-wheeler bearing Registration No.TN-36-Z-7814 on the Sathyamangalam to Mysore Road on 8.6.2012 at about 22.15 hours, at that time, the lorry belonging to the second respondent bearing Registration No.TN-52-1751 driven by the first respondent and insured with the third respondent, coming from Gobi to Mysore road, in a rash and negligent manner, hit the victim and caused the accident. The learned counsel for the claimants would submit that even though the First Information Report, Ex.P-1 was stated to be given by P.W.2, P.W.2 has categorically stated in his evidence that the police obtained his signature in blank













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top