V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. The petitioner has approached this Court against the order of Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench, Madras, dated 8th July, 2014 passed in O.A.No.109 of 2013. By the said order, the Central Administrative Tribunal dismissed the O.A. preferred by the petitioner. The OA was directed against the notice and order of the respondents stating that in view of the Rules, the petitioner was not entitled to House Rent Allowance (HRA) and hence, they would deduct HRA already paid to her in 13 instalments.

3. The facts briefly stated are as under:

The petitioner is working as a Lab Technician in Department of Pathology under the first respondent, Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Foundation and Research, Puducherry (JIPMER). On 21.03.2003, she got married. Her husband is also working in the same institution. Thereafter, there were some differences between the husband and wife and the husband of the petitioner filed divorce petition in the year 2005. The divorce petition came to be dismissed on 25.02.2008.

4. It is the contention of the petitioner that soon after the marriage, as there were differences be