SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 2434

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
K. Jaishankar – Appellant
Versus
M. Devaraj – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.C.Kanagaraj

JUDGMENT :

1. This appeal is preferred as against the judgment dated 06.01.2012 passed in Criminal Appeal No.102 of 2011 on the file of V Additional Sessions Judge, Chennai, thereby reversing the conviction and sentence imposed vide the order dated 05.05.2011 passed in C.C.No.2661 of 2010 on the file of II Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai.

2. The case of the complainant is that he filed a complaint for the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act against the accused alleging that the accused issued a cheque for a sum of Rs.50,000/- towards the discharge of his legal liability dated 13.03.2010 drawn on Central Bank, Chennai. On presentation of the same on 13.03.2010, it was returned dishonour for the reason “insufficient funds” on 17.03.2010. It was communicated to the complainant with written memo. That this transaction, the complainant caused statutory notice dated 20.03.2010 and the same was duly received by the accused/respondent. After receipt of the same, the accused neither repaid the cheque amount nor issued any reply. Therefore, the complainant lodged a complaint for the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act against the accused.

3. The





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top