SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 2438

ABDUL QUDDHOSE
D. Ramanathan – Appellant
Versus
Union of India Rep by Chief Engineer – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr.S.Raghavan
For the Respondents: Mr.C.V.Ramachandramurthy, Senior Panel Counsel

ORDER :

1. The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging the Arbitral Award dated 19.12.2014, passed against the petitioner.

2. The brief facts leading to the filing of the instant petition are as follows:

(a) The work of Gauge Conversion between Pollachi Palghat - Screening salvaged ballast, Marking of High Flood Level and Danger Level in Minor Bridges, Transportation of Ballast was awarded to the petitioner by the first respondent. The Letter of Acceptance dated 2.2.2012 was issued to the petitioner. The total value of the work was fixed at Rs.1,06,06,096/-. The time for completion was three months i.e., on or before 1.5.2012. Subsequently, an agreement dated 28.4.2012 was executed between the parties.

(b) On receipt of the Letter of Acceptance, the petitioner had commenced the work. According to the petitioner, the nature of the work was such that the work could not be carried unless the formation was made ready. According to the petitioner, this work of making formation ready was given to some o





























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top