SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 2455

M.SUNDAR
Celestine – Appellant
Versus
Ebisal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. A. Arumugam.
For the Respondents: Mr. N. Sivakumar.

JUDGMENT :

1. Two items of immovable properties standing in the name of one M.Esthoor constitute the subject matter of the instant second appeal. One item of property admeasures 9 Ares or thereabouts in re-survey No.515/14, 17 in Kadiapattanam village, Kalkulam Taluk, Manavalakurichi Sub District in Kanyakumari district. The other item of immovable property admeasures 64.5 Ares or thereabouts comprised in Re.S.Nos.335/6, 7, 8 in Noondakara-B village, Agasteeswaran Taluk, Rajakkamangalam Sub District in Kanyakumari District. Both these items of immovable properties are described as garden land with coconut trees. These two items of properties standing in the name of one M.Esthoor shall hereinafter be collectively referred to as 'suit properties' for the sake of brevity and convenience. For the sake of clarity, these two items of suit properties with four boundaries as described in the records of court below are set out hereunder :

Sl. No.

1

2

District:

Kanyakumari

Kanyakumari

Sub District:

Manavalakurichi

Rajakk
















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top