SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 2506

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
M.S. RAMESH, J.
Vellaichamy – Petitioner
Versus
The District Collector, Tirunelveli – Respondent
W.P. (MD) No. 11721 of 2018
Decided On : 31-07-2018

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. S. Sukumar.
For the Respondent: Mr. N. Shanmuga Selvam.

The duty of the authorities to issue Legal heir-ship Certificate for Class-II legal heirs in the absence of Class-I legal heirs, as stipulated by the Indian Succession Act, 1925.

Headnote:

Legal heir-ship Certificate - Refusal to issue to Class-II legal heirs - Registration of Birth and Deaths Act, 1969, Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 8 and 9

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought a Legal heir-ship Certificate as a surviving Class-II legal heir, but the application was rejected, directing him to approach the Civil Court. The court analyzed the powers of the second respondent in refusing to issue the certificate and discussed the historical background and guidelines related to the issuance of Legal heir-ship Certificate.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the authorities had been refusing to issue Legal heir-ship Certificate for Class-II legal heirs based on an outdated letter from 1991, despite previous court orders deprecating this practice. The court held that the respondents were not justified in denying the certificate and directed them to conduct a proper enquiry and issue the certificate to the petitioner if he was entitled to it.

Issues: Refusal to issue Legal heir-ship Certificate to Class-II legal heirs, interpretation of powers of the second respondent, reliance on outdated guidelines, and the duty of the authorities to conduct proper enquiry.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the authorities are duty bound to issue Legal heir-ship Certificate for Class-II legal heirs in the absence of Class-I legal heirs, as stipulated by Sections 8 and 9 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. It also highlighted that in cases of serious rival claims for heir-ships, the parties should be referred to the Civil Court, but in all other cases, the authorities are bound to issue the certificate after a proper enquiry.

Final Decision: The impugned order was set aside, and the respondents were directed to conduct a proper enquiry and issue the Legal heir-ship Certificate to the petitioner if he was entitled to it.

ORDER :

1. The petitioner's maternal uncle, namely, Periyamadasamykonar, died on 09.11.2008. The said Periyamadasamykonar's wife had pre-deceased him and he had no children. The petitioner herein is surviving Class-II legal heir of Periyamadasamykonar. In this connection, he had made an application to the second respondent herein, on 12.08.2016, seeking for Legal heir-ship Certificate and by an order dated 25.08.2016 in Mu.Mu.Aal/ 4856/2016, the second respondent rejected the petitioner's application, on the ground that he was not the direct heir of the deceased and therefore, directed him to approach the Civil Court seeking for necessary relief. Challenging the said order dated 25.08.2016, the present writ petition has been filed.

2. Before analyzing the validity of the impugned order, it would appropriate to trace the powers of the second respondent in refusing to issue a Legal heir-ship Certificate to the Class-II legal heirs. There is no provision under the Registration of Birth and Deaths Act, 1969, or any other Act or Rules, empowering the Revenue Authorities to issue a Legal heir-ship Certificate. In the year 1981, a one man committee in District Revenue Administration suggested delegation of powers to the Tahsildar/Deputy Tahsildar for issuance of a Legal heir-ship Certificate and while accepting the recommendation, the Revenue Department in G.O. (Ms) No. 2906, dated 04.11.1981, had empowered the jurisdictional Tahsildar/Deputy Tahsildar to issue Legal heir-ship Certificate. Subsequently, by Letter (Rt) No. 1534, dated 28.11.1991 issued by the Revenue Department, certain conditions were imposed for issuance of Legal heir-ship Certificate, wherein one of the conditions was that the Tahsildar should refrain from issuing the Legal heir-ship Certificate to Class-II legal heirs with a further direction to advise the applicant to approach the Civil Court seeking for remedy. Certain other guidelines were also appended to the said letter dated 28.11.1991.

3. It is submitted that in view of the Letter (Rt) No. 1534, dated 28.11.1991, the authorities had been refusing to issue Legal heirs Certificate for Class-II legal heirs and advising them to approach the Civil Court. The impugned order is one such order relying upon Letter (Rt) No. 1534, dated 28.11.1991.

4. Subsequently, this Court, in various orders passed in writ petitions, have been deprecating the practice of the Tahsildars in refusing to issue the certificate for class-II legal heirs. The orders passed in some writ petitions are extracted hereunder:-

(i) In M. Arumugam and Others vs. The Tahsildar, Madurai District and Another, CDJ 2013 MHC 6017, it has been held as follows:-

9. The petitioners are claiming themselves to be class II heirs. The Tahsildar pleads his inability to consider the case, as according to him, it would be very difficult to collect the details of the class II heirs. I am not inclined to accept the said submission.

10. The Revenue Department is having lower level officers, who are familiar with the people living in the concerned Village. There are revenue officers under the Tahsildar. There are also village officers functioning in the villages and they would be in a position to know the members of the family. The village Administrative Officer is expected to know each and every family of the village. He cannot plead ignorance about the relationship. The village Administrative Officer is the Revenue Coordinating Officer of the Revenue Department. The Village Administrative Officer must keep a close watch on the village and he should update his information. The problem of issuing a legal heir certificate to class II heirs could be resolves, in case a workable method is adopted by the revenue authorities. Since enquiry has to be made, the Tahsildar can direct the parties to produce birth certificates indicating the relationship. The Tahsildar can also conduct an enquiry in the village level through the Village Administrative Officer. In case, at a later poin











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top