2018 Supreme(Mad) 2550
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
M.S. RAMESH, J.
Sudailaimuthu – Petitioner
Vs.
The District Collector, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(MD) No.16708 of 2018
Decided On : 02-08-2018
For the Petitioner: Mr. S. Selvakumar
For the Respondents:Mr. V. Anand Government Advocate
The court emphasized that the authorities are duty bound to issue Legal heirship Certificates for Class-II legal heirs in accordance with the mode of succession specified by the law, unless there are serious rival claims for the heirships that require establishment through proper evidence.
Headnote:
Legal heirship Certificate - Refusal to issue to Class-II legal heirs - Registration of Birth and Deaths Act, 1969, Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 8 and 9
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought a Legal heirship Certificate as the surviving Class-II legal heir of the deceased. The second respondent rejected the application, citing an outdated letter from 1991 and directed the petitioner to approach the Civil Court for relief. The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the rejection.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the authorities had been refusing to issue Legal heirship Certificates to Class-II legal heirs based on an outdated letter from 1991, despite several orders from the court directing otherwise. The court held that the refusal to issue the certificate to Class-II legal heirs was unjustified and set aside the impugned order, directing the authorities to conduct a proper enquiry and issue the Legal heirship Certificate to the petitioner.
Issues: Refusal to issue Legal heirship Certificate to Class-II legal heirs based on an outdated letter, despite court orders directing otherwise.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that when the law specifies the mode of succession, there is no impediment for the authorities to issue Legal heirship Certificates as per the prescribed mode of succession. The authorities are bound to issue Legal heirship Certificates for Class-II legal heirs unless there are serious rival claims for the heirships that require establishment through proper oral and documentary evidence.
Final Decision: The impugned order dated 19.12.2017 was set aside, and the authorities were directed to conduct a proper enquiry and issue the Legal heirship Certificate of the deceased to the petitioner.
The petitioner's grand son died on 06.04.2018. The petitioner herein is the surviving Class-II legal heir of Muthuselvam. In this connection, he had made an application to the second respondent herein, on 01.11.2017, seeking for Legal heir ship Certificate and by an order dated 19.12.2017 in O.Mu.A1/6131/2017, the second respondent rejected the petitioner's application, on the ground that he was not the direct heir of the deceased and hence, directed him to approach the Civil Court seeking for necessary relief. Challenging the said order dated 19.12.2017, the present writ petition has been filed.
2. Before analyzing the validity of the impugned order, it would appropriate to trace the powers of the second respondent in refusing to issue a Legal heir ship Certificate to the Class-II legal heirs. There is no provision under the Registration of Birth and Deaths Act, 1969, or any other Act or Rules, empowering the Revenue Authorities to issue a Legal heirship Certificate. In the year 1981, a one man committee in District Revenue Administration suggested delegation of powers to the Tahsildar/Deputy Tahsildar for issuance of a Legal heir ship Certificate and while accepting the recommendation, the Revenue Department in G.O (Ms) No.2906, dated 04.11.1981, had empowered the jurisdictional Tahsildar/Deputy Tahsildar to issue Legal heir ship Certificate. Subsequently, by Letter (Rt) No.1534, dated 28.11.1991 issued by the Revenue Department, certain conditions were imposed for issuance of Legal heir ship Certificate, wherein one of the conditions was that the Tahsildar should refrain from issuing the Legal heir ship Certificate to Class-II legal heirs with a further direction to advise the applicant to approach the Civil Court seeking for remedy. Certain other guidelines were also appended to the said letter dated 28.11.1991.
3. It is submitted that in view of the Letter (Rt) No.1534, dated 28.11.1991, the authorities had been refusing to issue Legal heirs Certificate for Class-II legal heirs and advising them to approach the Civil Court. The impugned order is one such order relying upon Letter (Rt) No.1534, dated 28.11.1991.
4. This Court, in various orders passed in writ petitions, have been deprecating the practice of the Tahsildars in refusing to issue the certificate for class-II legal heirs. The orders passed in some writ petitions are extracted hereunder:-
(i). In M.Arumugam & Others vs. The Tahsildar, Madurai South, Madurai and another reported in CDJ 2013 MHC 6017, it has been held as
9. The petitioners are claiming themselves to be class II heirs. The Tahsildar pleads his inability to consider the case, as according to him, it would be very difficult to collect the details of the class II heirs. I am not inclined to accept the said submission.
10. The Revenue Department is having lower level officers, who are familiar with the people living in the concerned Village. There are revenue officers under the Tahsildar. There are also village officers functioning in the villages and they would be in a position to know the members of the family. The village Administrative Officer is expected to know each and every family of the village. He cannot plead ignorance about the relationship. The village Administrative Officer is the Revenue Co-ordinating Officer of the Revenue Department. The Village Administrative Officer must keep a close watch on the village and he should update his information. The problem of issuing a legal heir certificate to class II heirs could be resolves, in case a workable method is adopted by the revenue authorities. Since enquiry has to be made, the Tahsildar can direct the parties to produce birth certificates indicating the relationship. The Tahsildar can also conduct an enquiry in the village level through the Village Administrative Officer. In case, at a later point of time, it is turned out to be a false claim, it is open to the Tahsildar to can the certificate and even criminal action can be taken. The d